1. Celebration
2. Program Review
- CSIP - Goal 8
- Start reviewing demonstrators to update. Include any new evidence. Keep a PR evidence folder in your Google Drive (with student work). Your collab folder is evidence with LPs and Common Assessments.
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Monday, November 11, 2013
11.11.13 PLC
11.11.13 Agenda
1. Celebrations
4. Please read the post from November 8th regarding Program Review.

5. Next scheduled meeting is Nov. 27 (No School). I will update everyone if we need to meet on another date.

1. Celebrations
- Football Team - General Like during the season
- FFA
- Basketball Team - Youngman getting them ready
- Review SBDM comments
4. Please read the post from November 8th regarding Program Review.
5. Next scheduled meeting is Nov. 27 (No School). I will update everyone if we need to meet on another date.

Sunday, November 10, 2013
From the Commissioner
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2013
What's Next for Program Reviews
Recently, the Kentucky Department of Education (KDE) released the first report on Program Reviews for arts and humanities, practical living/career studies and writing programs. These Program Reviews were required by Senate Bill 1 (2009) to be included as a part of the Unbridled Learning accountability system. For more information about the results from the Program Reviews, please see the news release. I thought readers might want to know a little more about Program Reviews and what comes next.
Why do we have Program Reviews? Senate Bill 1 wanted to ensure that Kentucky children have access to a balanced education. A balanced education includes core academic areas (math, language arts, social studies and science) and areas such as arts/humanities, practical living (health and physical education), career studies, writing, world language and K-3 programs. Kentucky has had a vision of a balanced education since the 1990 Kentucky Education Reform Act and Senate Bill 1 continued that vision. Children are much more than test scores and test scores do not tell the entire story about a class, school or district. As a former high school band director, I am very proud that Kentucky includes an emphasis on the arts in the state accountability system.
What are Program Reviews? Program Reviews are systemic reviews of a program area that includes components such as curriculum, instruction, student assessment/performance, student opportunities and access, professional development and resources. In Kentucky, we worked with many education groups and educators to develop scoring rubrics for each of the components.
How valid and reliable are Program Reviews? Any component of an accountability system must be able to answer this question. All Program Reviews go through an extensive process of piloting and field testing before becoming part of the accountability system. Extensive research is done to address questions about validity and reliability. However, now that the “real world” results are in for the first year of inclusion in the accountability system, we are taking several steps to continue to address validity and reliability issues.
1. KDE will initiate an audit process that was developed during the
last two years. This audit process will include a number of
random schools as well as “purposeful” schools. Purposeful
schools will be chosen by comparing other school data to
the Program Reviews scores for outliers.
2. KDE will start a research project to determine connections
between quality programs and their impact on student
achievement. Writing tends to work best since there is a
writing achievement score and a program review score,
however, we have to be cautious in this approach since
the writing scores are derived from either on-demand
writing or language mechanics. A successful writing program
addresses more than these two areas. In arts/humanities and
practical living, KDE will make some connections between
overall scores and Program Review scores.
3. KDE will work to find model programs that school staff
can use to assist their local scoring. Schools and districts
would use these exemplars just like examiners use
exemplar writing papers in training and calibrating scores.
4. KDE will continue to upgrade training on the rubric
and the scoring process.
5. Districts will receive support and training on how to
conduct local audits of Program Reviews.
1. KDE will initiate an audit process that was developed during the
last two years. This audit process will include a number of
random schools as well as “purposeful” schools. Purposeful
schools will be chosen by comparing other school data to
the Program Reviews scores for outliers.
2. KDE will start a research project to determine connections
between quality programs and their impact on student
achievement. Writing tends to work best since there is a
writing achievement score and a program review score,
however, we have to be cautious in this approach since
the writing scores are derived from either on-demand
writing or language mechanics. A successful writing program
addresses more than these two areas. In arts/humanities and
practical living, KDE will make some connections between
overall scores and Program Review scores.
3. KDE will work to find model programs that school staff
can use to assist their local scoring. Schools and districts
would use these exemplars just like examiners use
exemplar writing papers in training and calibrating scores.
4. KDE will continue to upgrade training on the rubric
and the scoring process.
5. Districts will receive support and training on how to
conduct local audits of Program Reviews.
Within the next few weeks, KDE will update the Unbridled Learning accountability scores for schools and districts to include the results from the 2013 Program Review results. KDE will then reset the 90th percentile and 70th percentile scores for schools and districts which will serve as the baseline for comparing accountability results in 2014. Readers can find the results of their school and district Program Reviews in KDE Open House. The revised accountability scores and targets for schools and districts will be posted in theSchool Report Card later this month.
Posted by Dr. Terry Holliday at 11:13 AM
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
10.30.13 Agenda
1. If you are using Chromebooks, please check the list in front of the binder that details the Chromebooks that are missing from your cart each time you use them. Please check before students use them and after they return them. Doing this should make it much easier to narrow down possibilities should there be more Chromebooks that are unaccounted for in the future.
2. Reminders:
- Self Assessments - Put into your PGES folder
- Update Achievement Museum by Nov. 15th
- ValEd Survey submitted by Nov. 15th
- LPs due weekly by 8am Monday
- Major Assessments in Google Folder
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
PLC 10.16.13
- Any additional goals by December we have as a PLC team?
*Program Review
2. Remember to finish your self analysis.
2. Remember to finish your self analysis.
5. Major Assessment Protocol - Katie Chapman (if time permits)
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
2. Major Assessments
- Life Cycle Major Assessment
- Mrs. Girdley's Assessment, 30 MC with Reading Comprehension with 3 MC questions.
* Reading portion - incorporates our SMART goal with R.1 Standard
* Question format (MC) is what they will use on future testing
* Plenty of space for mapping the reading
* AG will align his assessments with KOSSA standards and keep Reading Standards in mind
* Some are very simple DOK, could have higher DOK
- Presentation Calendar
- Life Cycle Major Assessment
- Mrs. Girdley's Assessment, 30 MC with Reading Comprehension with 3 MC questions.
* Reading portion - incorporates our SMART goal with R.1 Standard
* Question format (MC) is what they will use on future testing
* Plenty of space for mapping the reading
* AG will align his assessments with KOSSA standards and keep Reading Standards in mind
* Some are very simple DOK, could have higher DOK
- Presentation Calendar
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Major Assessment #1
Monday, September 9, 2013
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
9.4.13
Get Pumped Up!
Agenda 9.4.13
1. Celebrations
2. Review of Norms
3.Quarterly PLC Outcomes
4. Review Program Review Analysis from 8.30.13
-Program Review Action Plan
5. Review Reading SMART Goals from last school year
-2012-2013 -% Correct 12-13
6. Start IA Pre-Analysis to set SMART Goals in Reading IA.1
-IA Analysis
PLCS will focus on the raising the proficiency level for the Reading Standard R.1.
Focus for 9th R.1.2 and R.1.3
Focus for 10th R.1.5, R.1.6, and R.1.9
.
Agenda 9.4.13
1. Celebrations
2. Review of Norms
3.Quarterly PLC Outcomes
4. Review Program Review Analysis from 8.30.13
-Program Review Action Plan
5. Review Reading SMART Goals from last school year
-2012-2013 -% Correct 12-13
6. Start IA Pre-Analysis to set SMART Goals in Reading IA.1
-IA Analysis
PLCS will focus on the raising the proficiency level for the Reading Standard R.1.
Focus for 9th R.1.2 and R.1.3
Focus for 10th R.1.5, R.1.6, and R.1.9
.
Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Monday, August 19, 2013
Agenda 8.21.13
Kick-off of the 2013-2014 PLC Season
1. Celebration
a. G20
b. IA Reading goals success
c. Culture Walks - Rockstar ;)
d. FFA -Community Service - Citizenship!!!
2. Establishing Norms
a. Start and End on Time/Attendance - if you are to be absent, contact Leslie
b. Student Driven
c. Program Review - Priority Status
d. Cross-curricular opportunities
3. PLC Vision and Semester 1 Outcomes
4. Friday 30th
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Leaders great job getting class visions posted on our Blog.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)